On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 17:49 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 11:35:23AM -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > > They were referenced in the links. > > > Anyway, here is the list of all packages that didn't build successfully > > > with 4.4, for details look at the provided links or try to build in > > > dist-f11-gcc44 --scratch yourself (Karsten, could you please build libtool > > > in dist-f11-gcc44, so that people actually can do that themselves? > > > I only had a --scratch libtool build in my local repo). > > > > I'm confused - you have yum mentioned in this list but it's not in any > > of the directories you linked to before. > > Ah, right, forgot about those, there are also 117 failures because a newer > package has been built in rawhide since 20090126 and so wget used in the > script failed to grab it during the mass rebuild. So, those packages > weren't attempted to be rebuilt at all, they might pass, or might fail. > > Sorry. Not a problem. I was mainly confused b/c yum isn't compiled, at all, so the gcc changes had me fairly well boggled as to how they impact yum. :) Thanks for the explanation and thanks for the report in general, it's great. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
