Re: Results of a test mass rebuild of rawhide-20090126 with gcc-4.4.0-0.9

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 11:35:23AM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> > They were referenced in the links.
> > Anyway, here is the list of all packages that didn't build successfully
> > with 4.4, for details look at the provided links or try to build in
> > dist-f11-gcc44 --scratch yourself (Karsten, could you please build libtool
> > in dist-f11-gcc44, so that people actually can do that themselves?
> > I only had a --scratch libtool build in my local repo).
> 
> I'm confused - you have yum mentioned in this list but it's not in any
> of the directories you linked to before.

Ah, right, forgot about those, there are also 117 failures because a newer
package has been built in rawhide since 20090126 and so wget used in the
script failed to grab it during the mass rebuild.  So, those packages
weren't attempted to be rebuilt at all, they might pass, or might fail.

Sorry.

	Jakub

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux