On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Jon Stanley <jonstanley@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:46 AM, drago01 <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Well the point is not the size of the DVD image itself but having a >> liveDVD instead of a liveCD (going away from the 700MB size limit) > > Keep in mind that the same spin for all arches is produced using the > same kickstart (i.e. fedora-livecd-desktop.ks). So the technical > feasibility of keeping a LiveCD for x86 and DVD for x86_64 is nearly > nil, unless we broke up the kickstarts (which I for one am not in > favor of). I am aware of that, but as both need to be tested anyway that should not be really a blocker. Instead of just discussion this every 2nd release[1] (same as the boot time thread [2] that shows up at the beginning of each rawhide cycle), we should decide whether we[3] want this, and then go on implementing this. 1: it just feels like this so don't come up with "but there was no such thread for fedora n" 2: and ends up into a do we need a MTA started by default flamewar (but that's a different topic) 3: now who is "we" ... FESCO, rel-eng ? Who is app to make this decision ? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
