On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:29:49AM -0600, Joe Nall wrote: >> >> On Jan 31, 2009, at 11:22 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 05:12:18PM +0100, drago01 wrote: >>>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Jan Kratochvil >>>> <jan.kratochvil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:57:50 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: >>>>>> But our live images are already heavily size-constrained. There's >>>>>> definitely >>>>>> no room for multiple kernels on the KDE live image, and I don't >>>>>> think the >>>>>> GNOME image has any room left either. >>>>> >>>>> Was already discussed the requirement of CDs nowadays? Even the >>>>> oldest >>>>> computers already have DVD and I miss more a fully-featured >>>>> LiveDVD 5GB spin. >>>> >>>> Well for x86_64 we can/should do this. >>>> Good luck on finding a x86_64 computer/laptop without a DVD drive. >>> >>> http://shop.lenovo.com/SEUILibrary/controller/e/web/LenovoPortal/en_US/catalog.workflow:category.details?current-catalog-id=12F0696583E04D86B9B79B0FEC01C087¤t-category-id=FB7AF02917DF464B80B47A578BC9DD24 >>> >>> Note that while a DVD drive is an option, it does not come with one >>> by default and it costs $225.00 extra. It took me 30 seconds to >>> find that machine. I'm sure there are more. >> >> I think that is a poor example for this discussion since it doesn't have >> a CD option at all. The link is to a laptop with no optical media. The >> only media choice is a DVD burner. > > You can think whatever you like. The assertion was that all x86_64 > machines have a CD/DVD drive and that is very much not the case. Well lets change this "all x86_64 hardware with optical drives" ... because it does not matter for such a machine if we use a CD or a DVD. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
