Re: Features/ArchitectureSupport - changing what we build for

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I wrote:
>> But our live images are already heavily size-constrained. There's
>> definitely no room for multiple kernels on the KDE live image, and I don't
>> think the GNOME image has any room left either.
>
> And I'll add to this that I think the real solution is to make the x86_64
> image the default download and the 32-bit image a separate link (maybe
> marketed primarily for netbooks). Most computers these days are 64-bit
> capable. (Almost all the new non-netbook computers are.) Running 32-bit
> userspace on a 64-bit kernel is just a kludge, we should be promoting pure
> 64-bit instead.

Yeah users should not have to search for the 64bit version, it should
be the default with a link "For older systems click here"(32bit
version).

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux