Re: what requires fedora-release-notes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 11:15 +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> Peter Vrabec wrote:
> > thnx. folks,
> > 
> > I have filed two bugs:
> > 
> > 1. don't require fedora-release-notes in fedora-release
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483018
> > 
> > 2. install fedora-release-notes vie "base" group
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483019
> > 
> 
> Right, so now "fedora-release-notes" is in @base, instead of 
> "system-release-notes". As commented in the bug, can this be changed?
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Jeroen van Meeuwen
> -kanarip

Not until yum groupinstall operates on provides rather than strictly
package names.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux