thnx. folks, I have filed two bugs: 1. don't require fedora-release-notes in fedora-release https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483018 2. install fedora-release-notes vie "base" group https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483019 On Wednesday 28 January 2009 11:24:04 pm Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:05:41AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 13:50 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:03:06AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 19:02 +0100, Daniel Mach wrote: > > > > > Jesse, is there any important data in this package which needs to > > > > > be shipped in Fedora at any cost? > > > > > I can imagine some legal or licensing information about Fedora. > > > > > > > > I don't believe so. > > > > > > The arguable value of the "About Fedora" item -- which as some Desktop > > > team members have noted, probably needs to be revamped -- is certainly > > > not enough to keep it. It would be prudent and probably good manners > > > to alert the Docs team about contemplating dropping this, too. > > > > Well, we would make it a default install item via groupings, but perhaps > > not /forced/ install, so that one could remove it/opt out of installing > > it should they wish. > > Thanks for clarifying this. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
