Hm well I never thought about licensing issues regarding LaTeX... When I look at: http://tug.org/texlive/copying.html They state: "To the best of our knowledge, all the software in TeX Live meets the requirements of the Free Software Foundation's definition of free software, and the Debian Free Software Guidelines. Where the two conflict, we generally follow the FSF." So maybe you dont want to rely on such a statement. But that makes quite an effort. Some of the mentioned packages also where in tetex which was part in fedora before and no one complained about license issues. On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:46:06 -0500 "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: TC> texmf/dvipdfmx/* dvipdfmx at least is GPL see readme: http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/dviware/dvipdfmx/ It would be really sad removing texlive for those license oddities. It would be quite some competitive disadvantage. Stefan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
