>>>>> "ATH" == Alec T Habig <habig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: ATH> If texlive is such a can of worms, why not "downgrade" to tetex? Is there some reason to believe that tetex was any better in this regard? ATH> That's still the RHEL tex solution. As a latex user, I noticed ATH> no functional difference between the two other than that I have ATH> to go re-setup local configuration stuff when fedora changed from ATH> tetex to texlive. I have had various users here (the math department at a large university) who have issues with either bugs or missing packages in tetex that are solved by texlive. The TeX mindset is that you must always have every package in existence installed because you must always be able to compile every document you might ever come across, so random missing packages actually do cause problems for some users. - J< -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
