Le Jeu 29 janvier 2009 14:29, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) a écrit : > In fact, I learned much more on packaging during the review of my > packages than when I created them. That's because when you're new, it > can be really hard to understand what those items mean. But when the > reviewer says: > - this item: > => FAIL because blahblahblah > > Then you think "oh, that's what this was supposed to mean ?". > > I'm not sure I made myself clear, but I do think that detailed reviews > are necessary. This has nothing to do with the trust we have in > packagers / sponsors, but with the submitter's trainship. Of course, failures need to be communicated to the packager with lotsof details :) I was objecting to the notion that evaluating a review could be done on a long list of self-declared OKs. -- Nicolas Mailhot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
