On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > The general consensus seem to push for more of a best practises > document. So I am going with > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Markmc/Draft_package_update_guidelines Once more: Why do we not explicitly ask the Bodhi submitter for details using much more fields? Having more possibilities to fill data in makes it easier to new packagers - they're remembered. Why do you want to solve a thing with a Guideline rather enhancing Bodhi and making that software just packager friendly? Greetings, Robert -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
