Re: Draft: simple update description guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Denis Leroy wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
* All Updates must refer to a upstream changelog or equivalent if one exists. Otherwise a brief description (a couple of sentence at most) justifying the need for an update must be provided by the maintainers pushing the update.

-1

This is borderline insane.

There is no voting. That is left to FESCo and you are not being specific.

Also this draft should be written by somebody who has significant packaging experience.

This is a mix of assumptions, elitism and my dad is taller than yours territory. Keep the feedback constructive and focus on the proposal rather than the proposer. Thanks.

Rahul


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux