Re: Draft: simple update description guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 09:25:52PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Instead of requiring new levels of over-pure whiteness of new packages,
> please focus on how the existing morass can be improved.

I think you're right on the money here.

But we can learn from Debian.  Debian rebuild the whole repository
continuously, so that FTBFS bugs are found earlier.  More importantly
they run scripts over existing packages to identify bugs (packages
which are not consistent with the guidelines) and are not afraid to
raise mass-bugs about them.

For example:

 - packages that fail lintian checks (the Debian equivalent of rpmlint)
 - scripts which check licenses on individual source files in each
   package
 - checks which look for MIA packagers (who haven't responded to bug
   reports for years for example)
 - file conflicts

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat  http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines.  Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into Xen guests.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-p2v

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux