Re: rawhide report: 20090124 changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2009-01-24 at 14:18 +0200, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
>  You are correct, 0.7-07 / 0.7-0.8 would have been correct. But I am not 
> the primary maintainer and I wanted to be sure that Paul's (i.e. primary 
> maintainer) local tree is not affected by any changes that I made. And I 
> have also tried to emphasize that these were just rebuilds without any 
> change in functionality at all.

That's a good thought, but going to non-standard versioning just
confuses things.  You've made a change to the package, it's going to
"affect" Paul's local tree no matter what.

Please stick to the standard policies when changing packages,
particularly somebody else's package.  Thanks!

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux