On 01/24/2009 01:56 PM, Thomas Moschny wrote:
2009/1/24 Conrad Meyer <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx>:
On Saturday 24 January 2009 03:49:46 am Thomas Moschny wrote:
2009/1/24 Rawhide Report <rawhide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
pam_mysql-0.7-0.6.rc1.fc11.2
Why isn't that simply named "pam_mysql-0.7-0.7.rc1.fc11", or even
"...-N.rc1.fc11", N being a single integer?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages
Yes, that explains -0.N, but not the .2 at the end.
You are correct, 0.7-07 / 0.7-0.8 would have been correct. But I am not
the primary maintainer and I wanted to be sure that Paul's (i.e. primary
maintainer) local tree is not affected by any changes that I made. And I
have also tried to emphasize that these were just rebuilds without any
change in functionality at all.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
