On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 11:46 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > [ shrug... ] There's not that many, and it would have required more > work on the part of the affected maintainers to deal with a nonstandard > tag than just to rebuild. If I expected anyone to have to do more than > a respin, then a tag would have been a good idea because the work would > be a bit drawn out. But no one objected last week to having to do a > respin once 5.1 went into the tree... Well nobody but me, who's supposed to keep the trees something sane and usable. To use the non-standard tag would just be adding a bit more to your make build call, really not that difficult. Please consider using it in the future if you're going to break such a wide array of packages. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
