On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 14:29 +0100, devzero2000 wrote:The base package can't be multilib, as the paths aren't unique. You can
> it is very boring not also have the 32 - bit version of httpd on 64 bit SO.
> Often it is required the installation commercial 32 bit apache modules - i
> am speaking of RHEL . But certainly install an 32 bit operating system on
> machines with 10 g of RAM - that i have - is not a thing magnificent. Then
> it would be useful to install on a 64 bit SO AND an 32 bit Apache but the
> repo (or RHN) default don't have. Sure, i can do anyway on RHEL5.
>
> (Aside) On Fedora 10 64 bit i have also enabled the repo 32 but strangely
> enough, i have an error of conflict (on RHEL5 it is ok) . But that is off
> topic, perhaps.
>
> yum install httpd.i386
>
> Transaction Check Error:
> file /etc/httpd/modules from install of httpd-2.2.10-2.i386 conflicts with
> file from package httpd-2.2.10-2.x86_64
>
> The same with squid.
>
> It is also true with %_transaction_color 3 in /etc/rpm/macros.color
only have one /usr/sbin/httpd and which arch wins if you try to install
both? You won't be able to run both a 64bit httpd instance and a 32bit
httpd instance.
You can do chroots or virt images in order to serve up your 32bit needs
though.
Of course. What i have said is certainly incorrect. Too many mail........
Thanks for the reply.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
