Re: Lua module packages are not multi-lib, how to do?

[devzero2000 <pinto.elia@xxxxxxxxx>]

2009/1/14 Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 13:00 +0100, yersinia wrote:
> Sure ? httpd-devel exists but in the x86_64 branch does not exist httpd
> i386. Or it is  an exception ? And if so why ?

That would only happen if the httpd-devel.i386 package had no arch
specific requires upon the httpd.i386 package.

it is very boring not also have the 32 - bit version of httpd on 64 bit SO. Often it is required the installation commercial 32 bit apache modules - i am speaking of RHEL . But certainly install an 32 bit operating system on machines with 10 g of RAM - that i have - is not a thing magnificent. Then it would be useful to install on a 64  bit SO AND an 32 bit Apache  but the repo (or RHN) default don't have. Sure, i can do anyway on RHEL5.

(Aside) On Fedora 10 64  bit i have also enabled the repo 32 but strangely enough, i have an error of conflict (on RHEL5 it is ok) . But that is  off topic, perhaps.

yum install httpd.i386 

Transaction Check Error:
  file /etc/httpd/modules from install of httpd-2.2.10-2.i386 conflicts with file from package httpd-2.2.10-2.x86_64

The same with squid.

It is also true with %_transaction_color     3 in /etc/rpm/macros.color 

Best Regards


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list