Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 03:56:28PM +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Wasting my time typing this email is a little more inclusive then I'd
like to see.
- you're confused on what process it is we're talking about
Suggested solution: read the Spins_Process page on the Wiki
- you're looking for what the process was and how we streamlined it
Suggested solution: read the Spins_Process page on the Wiki
As an external, though contrariant (and out of fedora) reader of
that page, it seems to me that some details are lacking, especially in
the part:
3. Spins SIG reviews the Spin
* If the Spin is accepted by the Spins SIG, the page is added to category Spins_Ready_for_Board
* If the Spin is not accepted by the Spins SIG, the page is removed from the Spins_Ready_for_SIG category, and goes back to category Incomplete_Spins
The process for 'Spins SIG reviews the Spin' is lacking.
Maybe it is just that I am missing some information known by
everybody involved, but it is not on this page.
There's an email in my drafts, that describes how I planned to build our
Spins_SIG_Review_Checklist. In fact, I saved that draft to the Wiki just
because I was creating it there and didn't have a local copy. It isn't
finished though, as obviously all this has to have some time to settle
in writing, somewhere for others to review and edit.
As you *may* have noticed, that Spins_SIG_Review_Checklist is also on
the Agenda.
Thank you,
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
