On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 11:13:04AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: [...] > We also are acknowledging here that we may not be able to get our > changes applied to the FHS (athimm tried to get libexecdir into FHS, for > instance, but was stymied by their current lack of interest in problems) > and we'll list more exceptions in the Guideline if necessary. What's the purpose of this statement then? > >>>> * Make adherence to the FHS a MUST, [...] Sounds like we're continuing business as usual - we'll continue to use FHS from 2004, and will make ad-hoc decisions as required about exceptions, because as we've seen there is no hope of getting any changes into FHS itself, since FHS is a dead project. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones Read my OCaml programming blog: http://camltastic.blogspot.com/ Fedora now supports 68 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
