On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 02:01:47PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 01:16:59PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >> * Make adherence to the FHS a MUST, [...] > > > > Is there a recognized process for getting changes into upstream FHS? > > Changes to the FHS are discussed on their mailing list hosted on > Sourceforge:: > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/freestandards/ The discussion there seems mainly to revolve around the topics of enlarging members and picking penny stocks: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=freestandards-fhs-discuss http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=freestandards-ldps I saw precisely 1 non-spam posting in the last 2 months (and that was just a question). This really matters. If we're going to block projects because they cannot fulfil FHS requirements (eg. as might have happened to MinGW because of the /usr/<target> path) then there must be a way to get changes into the FHS. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list