I reported it as a bug: Add improve-relatime.patch to F10 and rawhide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479052 -- Ricardo Arguello On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Ricardo Argüello <ricardo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Should I report the dropped improve-relatime.patch as a bug? The > mkinitrd is a whole different thing. > > What I wanted was the improve-relatime.patch to be included in F10, as > it is included in F9 by default: > http://people.redhat.com/mingo/relatime-patches/improve-relatime.patch > > -- > Ricardo Arguello > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Matthew Woehlke > <mw_triad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Ricardo Argüello wrote: >>> >>> Why was the improve-relatime.patch dropped from F10's kernel? F9 had >>> relatime on by default using this patch. >>> I first thought the upstream kernel had the patch now, but >>> /proc/mounts does not show relatime in F10. >>> >>> I found this bug, looks related: >>> >>> mkinitrd can't deal with the "relatime" mount option >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430280 >> >> Speaking of, this looks to be... how old? Any chance of getting it fixed? >> (Especially with SSD's becoming more popular, for which it makes particular >> sense to request relatime?) >> >> I mean... if you don't know about this bug and add relatime to fstab, you've >> just made it impossible to upgrade the kernel. And the work-around (edit >> fstab to remove relatime, 'yum update kernel', edit fstab to put back >> relatime) isn't very friendly. >> >> -- >> Matthew >> Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies. >> -- >> "Ethics? We've heard of it" -- Microsoft >> >> -- >> fedora-devel-list mailing list >> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list >> > -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
