Should I report the dropped improve-relatime.patch as a bug? The mkinitrd is a whole different thing. What I wanted was the improve-relatime.patch to be included in F10, as it is included in F9 by default: http://people.redhat.com/mingo/relatime-patches/improve-relatime.patch -- Ricardo Arguello On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ricardo Argüello wrote: >> >> Why was the improve-relatime.patch dropped from F10's kernel? F9 had >> relatime on by default using this patch. >> I first thought the upstream kernel had the patch now, but >> /proc/mounts does not show relatime in F10. >> >> I found this bug, looks related: >> >> mkinitrd can't deal with the "relatime" mount option >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430280 > > Speaking of, this looks to be... how old? Any chance of getting it fixed? > (Especially with SSD's becoming more popular, for which it makes particular > sense to request relatime?) > > I mean... if you don't know about this bug and add relatime to fstab, you've > just made it impossible to upgrade the kernel. And the work-around (edit > fstab to remove relatime, 'yum update kernel', edit fstab to put back > relatime) isn't very friendly. > > -- > Matthew > Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies. > -- > "Ethics? We've heard of it" -- Microsoft > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
