Re: proposal for fedora11 feature ReviewOMatic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/1/6 Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> +1
>> Noted down.
>>
>> https://fedorahosted.org/review-o-matic/ticket/3
>
>
> I don't know how you would do it in a submission request ticket, but
> if an existing contributor signed off on the submission from a new
> contributor, that sign off should be enough to get the build going.
> Such a signoff mechanism would hold that existing contributor
> accountable if it was a problematic build.
>
> That way, existing contributors could work on the submission review
> proactively with a new contributor to get things in shape for an a
> binding sponsorship review without blocking on a sponsor to do all the
> interaction with the new contributor in getting the the packaging
> cleaned up.
>

Yeah, very much right. We will discuss and check how this aspect can
be implemented.

-- 
rakesh

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux