Re: proposal for fedora11 feature ReviewOMatic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/1/6 Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Jeff Spaleta (jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx) said:
>> I think if we limit this service to packages only from people who have
>> signed the appropriate CLA and are a sponsored contributor I think
>> both the obvious trojan risk and the legal liability of distribution
>> risk fall within already acceptable levels comparable to the review
>> process we have.
>
> That's not bad; it's simple, should be easy to implement, and should get rid
> of most of the direct risks.
>

+1
Noted down.

https://fedorahosted.org/review-o-matic/ticket/3

-- 
rakesh

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux