Re: proposal for fedora11 feature ReviewOMatic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



+5 Stars from me

-- 
Michael F. Mondragon
http://www.michaelmondragon.net
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I hear and I forget.
I see and I remember.
I do and I understand.
       —Confucius
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Rakesh Pandit <rakesh.pandit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2009/1/6 Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> Jeff Spaleta (jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx) said:
>>> I think if we limit this service to packages only from people who have
>>> signed the appropriate CLA and are a sponsored contributor I think
>>> both the obvious trojan risk and the legal liability of distribution
>>> risk fall within already acceptable levels comparable to the review
>>> process we have.
>>
>> That's not bad; it's simple, should be easy to implement, and should get rid
>> of most of the direct risks.
>>
>
> +1
> Noted down.
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/review-o-matic/ticket/3
>
> --
> rakesh
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux