Re: Atlas and lapack provide the same library..compiled differently... is that a problem?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/1/5 Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> This has been reported before in bugzilla, but according to the package
>> maintainer the libraries are compatible.
>
> And yet, I have a user reporting missing symbols errors when the
> linker attempts to use the lapack package libraries instead of the
> atlas libraries. If they were compatible before, something has
> changed.

Yes - the problem is that that Atlas implemented versions of lapack
symbols get prefixed with clapack_ so these two liblapack libraries
are not ABI compatible.

This is an ugly situation - I think the Atlas liblapack should be
renamed to something else, personally.

However, to fix your scipy problem, wouldn't a Requires: atlas "fix"
the issue? (And associated BuildRequires, I guess). That's an obscene
hack tho :).

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux