Re: Atlas and lapack provide the same library..compiled differently... is that a problem?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Jonathan Underwood
<jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Note also that building against lapack means that you package
> installation may pull in atlas to satisfy the blas requirement of
> lapack. Or it may pull in the blas package (a subpackage of lapack
> which has a different blas implementation).


This is the sort of thing that concerns me.  But I can't reproduce the
reported problem and that unnerves me even more.  If this were a
fragile dep resolution  and linker logic interaction, that just
happens to work in the default install situations.. i should be able
to break it  by doing weird things like forcing nodep package erases
by hand and then asking yum to resolve deps.   But I can't.

-jef

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux