Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> The Atlas webpage suggests that the atlas lapack library does not have
> complete coverage of all functions in the original Lapack - is that
> not the case?
To be honest, I don't know for sure.
What I do know is that some stuff I built against the original Lapack picked
up ATLAS automatically when I installed it and worked fine against it.
But this is in no way a complete regression test.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
