Re: Summary of the 2008-10-21 Packaging Committee meeting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Debarshi Ray wrote, at 01/04/2009 06:38 PM +9:00:
Issues pending FESCo ratification:

[...]

* Desktop File guideline modification
** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/DesktopFileVendor
** This removes language which many interpreted as requiring most
  desktop files to be installed with --vendor=fedora.

What is the current status of this? Should new packages use
--vendor=fedora or not?

Cheers,
Debarshi


From:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-October/msg02273.html

=== Fedora Packaging Committee Guideline Proposals ===
* FESCo had no objections to the guideline proposals approved by the
FPC. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Minutes/20081021

Regards,
Mamoru

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux