Meeting minutes and full logs of the 2008-10-21 FPC meeting are online: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Minutes http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Minutes/20081021 Issues pending FESCo ratification: * Eclipse plugin guideline modification ** Reported on-list; archive is at https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2008-October/msg00121.html ** These tweak the guidelines to fix a few typos, clean the templates up a bit and accommodate changes in Eclipse 3.4. * Desktop File guideline modification ** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/DesktopFileVendor ** This removes language which many interpreted as requiring most desktop files to be installed with --vendor=fedora. Other discussions: * Cpack guidelines ** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/CmakeCpack ** The committee was unclear as to how this applied to packaging guidelines at all, as it seems to contain tips for upstream developers instead of instructions for Fedora packagers. * Tweaks to the specfile template for fonts ** https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_spec_template_correction_(fontconfig) ** This alters the template for font packages to deal with issues surrounding the /etc/fonts/conf.avail directory. ** FPC agreed with the proposal but had some suggestions; these will be addressed and the issue will be raised later. * New guideline relating to generically named packages and files. ** Tough to actually write a guideline involving the use of common sense as applied to things like this. ** Jason will draft a proposal for consideration soon. - J< -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
