Re: Package Review Stats for 2008

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/1/2 Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx>:
> We could just as easily make this 5, or 15.  The number isn't that
> important to me personally, and the community can help decide the
> cutoff point.

Do a histogram, fit a exponential distribution to the histogram, maybe
a Poisson distribution... the distribution of "rare events".  Define
the number of awards on the variance,mean,median, or some complication
combination there of.

This however will not solve the qauntity over quality problem.


-jef"You know what would be fun? A histogram of number of reviews
weighted by the number of non-whitespace characters in the specfile or
weighted by the total size of the sources associated with the
package"spaleta

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux