Re: Stability and Release Cycles - An Idea

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/23/08, Manuel Wolfshant <wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I fail to see why no update at all is a better policy than "we update what
> we can when we can, but we no longer officially support this vesion of the
> distribution. Please understand that you are in uncharted territory, we'll
> try to help as much as we can but you might be better by simply upgrading to
> a newer distro."

Correct, you "fail to see". Take a broader, more open-minded, look at
what defines "we", and "what", and "when" in the above statement.
I'd really rather find "Upgrade to the latest", as opposed to finding
"Here's our wishy-washy state, hope for the best".

jerry

-- 
To be named later.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux