On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Chuck Anderson <cra@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 06:47:07PM +0100, drago01 wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Nicolas Mailhot >> <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > >> > Le Mar 23 décembre 2008 15:05, Mat Booth a écrit : >> >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Richard Hughes <hughsient@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 10:55 +0000, Rawhide Report wrote: >> >>>> fontpackages-1.13-1.fc11 >> >>>> ------------------------ >> >>>> * Mon Dec 22 17:00:00 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nim at fedoraproject >> >>>> dot org> >> >>>> - 1.13-1 >> >>>> ⟃ Add another directory to avoid depending on unowned stuff >> >>>> ❤ use it to put the fontconfig examples in a better place >> >>> >> >>> Two new symbols! L33t. >> >>> >> >> >> >> The first one does not display for me. :-( All I see is a square >> >> with 27c3 inside. >> >> >> >> Am I missing a font or something? I'm using the latest Firefox 3 in >> >> F10. >> > >> > It's a math symbol so you're probably missing one of the optional >> > distro math fonts. >> >> Sorry but this starts to become annoying using weird symbols in the >> spec file has no added value. >> Why can't you just write a readable spec file like all other maintainers do? >> Using some non default fonts makes it even worse. >> Even when the fonts are displayed this makes the specfile "harder" to >> read than using simple "-". > > I agree. Consistency is key to readability. I guess we'll have to go > make a Packaging Guideline now that says what characters are > appropriate for use as bullets in changelogs. yeah if common sense does not work we need a guideline. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
