On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 06:47:07PM +0100, drago01 wrote: > On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Nicolas Mailhot > <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Le Mar 23 décembre 2008 15:05, Mat Booth a écrit : > >> > >> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Richard Hughes <hughsient@xxxxxxxxx> > >> wrote: > >>> On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 10:55 +0000, Rawhide Report wrote: > >>>> fontpackages-1.13-1.fc11 > >>>> ------------------------ > >>>> * Mon Dec 22 17:00:00 2008 Nicolas Mailhot <nim at fedoraproject > >>>> dot org> > >>>> - 1.13-1 > >>>> ⟃ Add another directory to avoid depending on unowned stuff > >>>> ❤ use it to put the fontconfig examples in a better place > >>> > >>> Two new symbols! L33t. > >>> > >> > >> The first one does not display for me. :-( All I see is a square > >> with 27c3 inside. > >> > >> Am I missing a font or something? I'm using the latest Firefox 3 in > >> F10. > > > > It's a math symbol so you're probably missing one of the optional > > distro math fonts. > > Sorry but this starts to become annoying using weird symbols in the > spec file has no added value. > Why can't you just write a readable spec file like all other maintainers do? > Using some non default fonts makes it even worse. > Even when the fonts are displayed this makes the specfile "harder" to > read than using simple "-". I agree. Consistency is key to readability. I guess we'll have to go make a Packaging Guideline now that says what characters are appropriate for use as bullets in changelogs. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
