On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Jerry Amundson <jamundso@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Never mind. It's perfect. Don't change a thing. No I won't let you off the hook that easily. There's no need to be sarcastic. It was a genuine question. The existing titles for the roles are a best effort. If you have a suggestions that you feel is more appealing, then please tell us. We aren't mind readers. At least not until we all have the Google neural implant installed. If I ruled the world, I'd of called that role 'Code Monkey', but its way to flippant a definition so I wouldn't seriously expect that to be generally preferred over the existing 'OS Developer' title. The goal of the Role definitions isn't to list every individual task or subgroup. The idea is to draw rough circles around common tasks,groups and skillsets. These circles overlap. You'll notice that some groups appear under different roles. All I am asking is to provide us with some more specific feedback on how to rename the role that is currently titled OS Developer. Its not enough to know that your confused by the current title. We need to know what would make sense to you as an alternative. -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
