On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jeff Spaleta wrote: >> >> That's a copout excuse. You are spending a lot of time right now >> beating your head on the brick wall on this issue. Figuring out a >> technical solution in the form of a LiveCD under the umbrella of the >> GNOME project might actually be the better argument than what you are >> doing now. > > Is there a fixed policy on how fedora must relate to upstream packages? > That is, do you have a requirement to take every default that the upstream > has (themes, etc.)? Or can any packager make any whimsical change he wants > at any time? Or something in between? > > -- > Les Mikesell > lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx What they all said so far is that it either has to be done upstream or the package maintainer has to do it by making a patch. In this nautilus case that's the same person. (i won't name him this time because they also say that won't help the discussion ^_^) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
