Bill Allombert wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:36:14AM -0800, Lee Howard wrote:
Jon Ciesla wrote:
What about simply keeping it on Sourceforge? Don't one of you have admin
access to the project there? I have a SF account currently.
As far as bringing libjpeg current, I'm not sure the task would be as
herculean as it sounds, activities at fd.o hotwithstanding, not sure what
that's about.
libjpeg is essentially dead.
I disagree with this statement. Upstream is very responsive. However
he is not inclined to put out new release currently, bu thti sdoes not
qualify libjpeg as essentially dead as far as I am concerned.
Who is 'he' in this case?
Cheers,
Bill Allombert,
Debian libjpeg6b maintainer.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
