> Jon Ciesla wrote: >>> "Jon Ciesla" <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>>>> (Yes, I know libjpeg upstream is kinda moribund, but if you want new >>>>> features in it you should be trying to revive upstream development, >>>>> not strongarm the Fedora package maintainer to take over >>>>> development.) >>>> I agree strongly with that principle. Two questions: >>>> A. What has been done thusfar WTR reviving upstream development? >>> Well, at one point I had more or less formally blessed Guido Vollbeding >>> as the new lead maintainer, but if he's actually put out a release I >>> haven't heard about it :-(. You could try bugging the people >>> associated >>> with the sourceforge libjpeg project. >> >> CCing them. libjpeg SourceForge team, what is the current status of >> libjpeg development? > > Jon, > > I have heard nothing in some time from Guido, and I'm not aware of him > producing any sort of libjpeg release. > > I find the situation somewhat frustrating. Agreed. So what's next? Is there a plan for further action, a new primary maintainer, etc? I think WRT gallery2, I'll see about patching the -crop call out of that plugin. > Best regards, > -- > ---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- > I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, > warmerdam@xxxxxxxxx > light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam > and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Programmer for Rent > -- in your fear, speak only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
