Dimi Paun wrote:
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 02:40 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I vote that we don't vote on configuration changes and let the
upstream
developers and package maintainers decide. Voting on every
configuration change, we would obvious not be getting anywhere. The
decision will be an upstream change or in other circumstances, the
maintainer of the software in question. If the maintainers want to do
a survey, they can on their own or ask for help if needed.
This makes lots of sense -- to be consistent, I suggest we remove
all Fedora-related artwork that diverges from upstream. Including
the desktop background images too.
Branding doesn't really have anything to do with configuration changes.
I suggest that you read
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WhyUpstream
For artwork and branding, Fedora is essentially upstream for many things
like Nodoka theme. To be consistent, the decision on which artwork to
pick among the many competing proposals is left to the artwork team and
not by a random vote in a mail cross posted to fedora-devel and
fedora-list either. You are confusing completely different things.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
