Re: Fedora 10 - Boot Analysis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 09:27:04AM -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> 
> We ran into a problem doing the LSPP evaluation with regards to email. Of all 
> the packages listed, the only one that really mattered for security was cron. 
> So, what we did was patched cron to be able to take an argument, -m, to 
> define the mail delivery agent. It could be a shell script, procmail, or 
> anything you wanted to take the cron output and move it into the local spool 
> dir. Would using this solve the problems being debated here?  (And since cron 
> can take a mail agent argument, it should not have a hard requirement for 
> sendmail.)

I propose a virtual provides mail(local), in this bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472710
You can skip right to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472710#c20

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux