Re: Fedora 10 - Boot Analysis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 17 December 2008 02:24:41 pm Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > And what are all those applications that are claimed depend on sendmail? 
> > Show it to me.
>
> Ask and you shall receive, at least for F10 with rpmfusion enabled:
> > repoquery --whatrequires --alldeps sendmail --qf "%{NAME}\n"|sort -u

We ran into a problem doing the LSPP evaluation with regards to email. Of all 
the packages listed, the only one that really mattered for security was cron. 
So, what we did was patched cron to be able to take an argument, -m, to 
define the mail delivery agent. It could be a shell script, procmail, or 
anything you wanted to take the cron output and move it into the local spool 
dir. Would using this solve the problems being debated here?  (And since cron 
can take a mail agent argument, it should not have a hard requirement for 
sendmail.)

-Steve

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux