On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Possibly, however package data in rpm headers is not wiki markdown and the
specification for RPM doesn't imply you can treat it that way.
The specification for RPM doesn't imply anything about the description
field. And this thread is about how to possibly improve the situation by
agreeing on some form of interpretation.
Then it shouldn't be discussed here, as fedora is not the only
user/consumer of rpm.
-sv
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
