Le mardi 16 décembre 2008 à 23:39 +0200, Nikolay Vladimirov a écrit : > Ok, it seems that i made a mess of my ideas in the process of writing > > My general ranting isn't against Unicode it's against using special > Unicode characters(bullets, and the "<<" thing). > A clean summary can be written with clear guidelines and common characters. A clean summary will be written with clear guidelines and correctly encoded text. > Is there any real benefit in using unicode bullet symbol, There is a real benefit if you want bullets displayed on the user systems. > the double arrow thing or quotes different from " ? The double arrow thing is a quoting form. It is the correct quoting form for my country. As others noted each locale is going to have a correct quoting form which is not necessarily ". Since I'm no native American English speaker, I won't comment on what the correct American English form is. As long as it's not a clear encoding violation like the “use accents as quotes” thing. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
