Le mardi 16 décembre 2008 à 12:36 -0600, Matthew Woehlke a écrit : > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le mardi 16 décembre 2008 à 12:02 -0600, Matthew Woehlke a écrit : > >> And those would be what buttons again? > > > > Those would be whatever the maintainer of your xkb layout wants them to > > be. Adding this stuff to an xkb layout is not rocket science and has > > been possible for a long time. > > So one of they keys on my keyboard should do something other than what I > expect? Bzzt. On an average keyboard, about 50% of the alt-ed space is not marked and let to the implementators discretion. Without going into Canadian six-level key complexity, four-level xkb layouts are the norm and I dare you to find a keyboard where all four levels are marked. > Then you're not writing human text, you're writing computer code. > Huh? No efforts are expended by console maintainers to make it keep up with the curreent demands of human text. Its target is “debugging things gone wrong” ¹ ¹ “I know the discussions I've had with distributions on these subjects they are thinking X is the user interface full stop, except for debug/things gone wrong.” (Alan Cox, 2008-12-01). -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
