Jeff Spaleta (jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx) said: > On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm not sure why a dependency on vim-minimal is truly that bad. > > Is this a requirement on vim-minimal or just a requirement for a posix > compliant editor to be available? It's a requirement on whatever provides _PATH_VI, as defined by glibc's /usr/include/paths.h. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
