On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm not sure why a dependency on vim-minimal is truly that bad. Is this a requirement on vim-minimal or just a requirement for a posix compliant editor to be available? Or let me ask it this way. Right now in the entire repository is vim-minimal the only editor which is being explicitly required to filling this fallback role? If it is, enshrine that as policy before I get a chance to submit a package which falls back to nano. If its not the only editor being used as a fallback in the repository, then some compromise needs to be worked out so don't have people dragging in multiple editors to fill the fallback capacity. -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
