On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Mat Booth <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 11:41:27AM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: >>> >>> But there is one way, how to achieve similar goal - make EPEL more >>> complete. Because you probably know how is RHEL created - it is a subset >>> of one Fedora release. Then add the remaining packages via EPEL and you >>> have Fedora with long term support. >> >> It is not the same. Fedora with LTS would be going from bleeding edge to >> stability, RHEL+EPEL is always stability. >> > > I don't think I understand this statement. Actually creating each RHEL > release from a release of Fedora isn't going from bleeding edge to > stability? > Sorry for replying to myself, but another thought occurred after I hit send: Maybe I don't understand *why* you need bleeding edge if what you want is stability... -- Mat Booth www.matbooth.co.uk -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
