Patrice Dumas píše v Út 09. 12. 2008 v 11:48 +0100: > On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 11:41:27AM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > > > > But there is one way, how to achieve similar goal - make EPEL more > > complete. Because you probably know how is RHEL created - it is a subset > > of one Fedora release. Then add the remaining packages via EPEL and you > > have Fedora with long term support. > > It is not the same. Fedora with LTS would be going from bleeding edge to > stability, RHEL+EPEL is always stability. And the release schedules are > very different, there are meny times when the next RHEL release is too > distant in the future, so some intermediate fedora release being LTS > would be different from RHEL+EPEL in this perspective too. Yes, it is not the same. And the delay between the Fedora release and corresponding RHEL release is also important, but it is the best you can get with the current resources. Dan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
