Re: The looming Python 3(000) monster

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kevin Kofler wrote:
Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Because it's only "clearly a bug" to you? I don't particularly mind if
my computer wants to tell me there are updates when I'm running on
battery. If I wasn't reading this thread, I never would have thought
anything of it.

Oh, sorry, I lost track of the context. Reporting updates while on battery
isn't obviously a bug, automatically getting updates installed without
being asked (which somebody mentioned elsewhere on the lists, though I'm
not sure it was in reference to KPackageKit or to something else) is (and
that's what the bug I filed against KPackageKit is about). I'm sorry for
the confusion, it's me who got all mixed up.

Still, AFAIK gnome-packagekit doesn't check for updates while on battery and
it may well be that future kpackagekit releases won't do it either, at
least by default. But it is more a missing feature than a bug.

Ah, ok. Maybe I should actually go read the bug you filed, then I'd realize we were miscommunicating :-). Sorry for the mix-up.

--
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
--
"Do you do windows as well?"
"Only when I'm forced to deal with Microsoft..."
  -- from a story by Feech

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux